[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1235170078.4736.42.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:47:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [announce] Performance Counters for Linux, v6
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 14:38 -0800, Corey Ashford wrote:
> There may be other non-event-related changes that will not be handled
> quite as well in this way. In the original email I hinted at that we
> may want an option for mmap'd sample buffers at some point, and so I'm
> not clear how you'd provide an ABI to request mmap'd buffers (you would
> probably need to be able to request the size and get back a pointer to
> the mmap'd buffer). Would this be done through a special
> sys_perf_counter_open call? Or through a subsequent ioctl call on the
> group leader after an open (which requires the counters to be initially
> disabled), etc.
What's stopping a regular mmap() call using the fd obtained from
sys_perf_counter_open() ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists