[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090220155309.d73b403c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:53:09 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI fixes for 2.6.29-rc5
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:40:56 +0000
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 15:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:02:07 -0600
> > James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Did the mpt-fusion MSI problems get sorted out? I think so...
>
> Yes, but in the PCI tree.
OK, fingers crossed for Jesse.
> > I believe that "scsi: mpt: suppress debugobjects warning" is 2.6.29
> > material. Sent 11 Feb, no response.
>
> This is http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12662 which is
> reported fixed with no code changes.
I think the followup is bogus.
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c:GetLanConfigPages() calls mpt_config()
against an on-stack CONFIGPARMS, which embeds an on-stack timer_list.
So we should still use init_timer_on_stack(). Hopefully that won't
explode if mpt_config() is called with a CONFIGPARMS which _isn't_ on
the stack.
argh, I'll ping Thomas again.
> > Also I believe that "hptiop: add new PCI device ID" should be in 2.6.29
> > (and earlier), below. I can send this on if you like.
>
> I have this marked for inclusion, I'm just sending out the fixes that
> have been incubating in next prior to reconstructing a new fixes tree.
ok, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists