[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090221170504.657ff791@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:05:04 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
To: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Liu Dave <DaveLiu@...escale.com>, sdhci-devel@...t.drzeus.cx,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] sdhci: Add quirk for controllers with no
end-of-busy IRQ
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:33:08 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote:
> From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
>
> The Samsung SDHCI (and FSL eSDHC) controller block seems to fail
> to generate an INT_DATA_END after the transfer has completed and
> the bus busy state finished.
>
> Changes in e809517f6fa5803a5a1cd56026f0e2190fc13d5c to use the
> new busy method are the cause of the behaviour change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> ---
Any objections to me merging this right away? It is needed for another
controller.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists