[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090221194814.GA24385@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:48:14 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Juergen Beisert <j.beisert@...gutronix.de>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux-arm@...ff.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fwd: PCF8583 not detected on RiscPC
Previous mail sent just to Jean:
| Any ideas why the RTC isn't being detected on the ARM RiscPC platform?
|
| Could it be because someone's decided to regress stuff because of having
| an i2c_boardinfo structure without actually first making sure everything
| is converted over?
|
| If yes, what do I need to do to make it work? (IOW, please supply a
| patch to fix the regression or explain in detail what's required to make
| it work.)
To summarise the situation, the bus driver is:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-acorn.c
which is not a platform driver. It is not initialised by the platform
code. It does not provide i2c_boarddata or whatever the funky name for
that feature is.
However, PCF8583 got converted to require i2c_boarddata without first
fixing up the platform which uses it, thereby making the driver utterly
useless.
Putting i2c_boarddata into i2c-acorn.c feels wrong.
So, please either revert 02bb584f3b1cfc8188522a4d2c8881b65073a4f1 so
that the regression can be fixed (no RTC on Acorn RiscPC machines) or
provide a patch which fixes this mess that the above change causes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists