linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [PATCH/RESEND] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d82e647a0902210021m27cb1c18s9bf7edb7ffe08d68@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:21:51 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	kay.sievers@...y.org, greg@...ah.com, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH/RESEND] driver core: remove polling for 
	driver_probe_done(v4)

> that is not the right solution. The patch that introduced
> wait_for_device_probe() was there to make sure it all happens in one
> central location. To then decentralize this 2nd function call to all
> locations that call the function does not make sense to me.....

OK, I'll resend a patch, which add async_synchronize_full() in
wait_for_device_probe().

Thanks!

>
>
> --
> Arjan van de Ven        Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
> visit http://www.lesswatts.org
>



-- 
Lei Ming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/