[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1skm6cd3z.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:37:20 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Rework disabling of interrupts during suspend-resume
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> Moreover, the real purpose of these changes is to be able to execute the
> "late" suspend and "early" resume device callbacks with timer interrupts
> enabled, so that they can use mutexes etc. However, x86 currently doesn't set
> the IRQF_TIMER flag and I need to make it do so before going further in this
> direction and changing the PCI PM framework to take advantage of the $subject
> changes, for example. So, I need to know how to modify x86 timer code so that
> the IRQF_TIMER flag is set by it.
How does this sync with the ACPI requirement that the it's late suspend MUST
happen with irqs disabled?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists