linux-kernel - Re: Broken "User namespaces: Only put the userns when we unhash the uid"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4945.1235386767@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:59:27 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	serue@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Broken "User namespaces: Only put the userns when we unhash the uid"


So, free_uid() calls free_user_ns(), which calls free_uid()...  Obvious,
really.   I wonder if free_user_ns() should always be deferred irrespective of
whether CONFIG_USER_SCHED is set.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/