[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m17i3h5rn7.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:17:32 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Handle interrupts that happen during initialization.
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> In the current pciehp implementation, minimum resources enough to
>> enable devices under the bridge are assigned when P2P bridge is
>> hot-added. My concern is that enough resources are NOT assigned to
>> the bridge if an additional slot is empty. As a result, hot-add
>> adapter card on the additional slot won't work because of resource
>> shortage.
>
> It is a good concern. Right now I know I won't need a bus number
> but you are quite right the mmio and iospace may be a problem.
>
> My preliminary test case doesn't cover that so I will look and
> confirm it is a problem I need to address.
Tested. I do have a problem with not assigning resources to new
bridges.
My plan to handle this currently is to do what the pci code does for
cardbus without resources. To give them a fixed sized resource
assignment without looking downstream from the bridge. The code
looks simple, and we have existing practice so it should not be too
bad to deal with.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists