[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1235395194.6216.60.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:19:54 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/20] Simplify the check on whether cpusets are a
factor or not
Hi Mel,
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:39 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> An #ifdef in a function is ugly all right. Here is a slightly
> different
> version based on your suggestion. Note the definition of number_of_cpusets
> in the !CONFIG_CPUSETS case. I didn't call cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall()
> for the preferred zone in case it wasn't in the cpuset for some reason and
> we incorrectly disabled the cpuset check.
>
> =====
> Simplify the check on whether cpusets are a factor or not
>
> The check whether cpuset contraints need to be checked or not is complex
> and often repeated. This patch makes the check in advance to the comparison
> is simplier to compute.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Looks good to me!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists