[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090223144312.GC22617@shadowen.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:12 +0000
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: checkpatch --file warns about p0 patch
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:20:21PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> When running checkpatch.pl with --file option it warns about -p0 patch:
>
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file ./drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c
> WARNING: patch prefix '.' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 263 lines checked
>
> ./drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>
> I hope this is the fix that'll work:
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 45eb0ae..1869388 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ sub process {
> $realfile =~ s@^([^/]*)/@@;
>
> $p1_prefix = $1;
> - if ($tree && $p1_prefix ne '' && -e "$root/$p1_prefix") {
> + if (!$file && $tree && $p1_prefix ne '' && -e "$root/$p1_prefix") {
> WARN("patch prefix '$p1_prefix' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch\n");
> }
>
>
>
> --
Hmm, that should already be fixed in the version Andrew Morton has.
Could you test with v0.28 and confirm its already fixed?
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-v0.28
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists