[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524f69650902222007o3f56d394yecab17c22296aaa4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:07:05 -0600
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Horst Reiterer <horst.reiterer@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Horst Reiterer
<horst.reiterer@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Steve French wrote:
>> Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option? How about
>> "nostrictfsync" ?
>
> Sound good, should be self-explanatory for Samba users and those familiar
> with the fsync concept.
>
> Horst.
Patch attached for nostrictfsync cifs mount option
--
Thanks,
Steve
View attachment "new-mount-option.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (4378 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists