[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090223111009.d48ff81d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:10:09 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, stable@...nel.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix lazy vmap purging (use-after-free error)
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:17:26 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:29:36AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Monday 23 February 2009 16:17:09 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > The boot CPU runs in the context of its idle thread during boot-up.
> > > During this time, idle_cpu(0) will always return nonzero, which will
> > > fool Classic and Hierarchical RCU into deciding that a large chunk of
> > > the boot-up sequence is a big long quiescent state. This in turn causes
> > > RCU to prematurely end grace periods during this time.
> > >
> > > This patch creates a new global variable that is set to 1 just before
> > > the boot CPU first enters the scheduler, after which the idle task
> > > really is idle.
> >
> > Nice work all (btw. if this patch goes in rather than using system_state,
> > then please make the variable __read_mostly).
>
> Hmmm... I misread this and made system_state be __read_mostly. Let
> me know if this is bad, easy to fix if needed.
Please don't use system_state. The whole thing is just bad design.
It's a global variable, breaks encapsulation, creates interactions etc.
CS-101 stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists