[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0902231227v687deb70r294bcf9a9b059d6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:27:19 +0100
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: clean up __GFP_* flags a bit
2009/2/23 Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:55:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Subject: mm: clean up __GFP_* flags a bit
>> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>> Date: Mon Feb 23 12:28:33 CET 2009
>>
>> re-sort them and poke at some whitespace alignment for easier reading.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>
> It didn't apply because we are working off different trees. I was on
> git-latest from last Wednesday and this looks to be -mm based on the presense
> of CONFIG_KMEMCHECK. I rebased and ended up with the patch below. Thanks
I will take the remaining parts and apply it to the kmemcheck tree. Thanks!
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists