[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090222.215906.240407314.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:59:06 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andi@...stfloor.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86's nmi_hz wrt. oprofile's nmi_timer_int.c
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:52:00 +0100
> > Again, the code in nmi_timer_int.c doesn't.
> >
> > It uses the NMI watchdog timer interrupts, it catches DIE_NMI
> > events.
> >
> > > Does that answer your question?
> >
> > Not really.
>
> Ah see what you mean now. The nmi_timer_int code can only
> be active ever when the cpu is not known to nmi_int.c and
> when the nmi watchdog is in io apic mode. But IO apic mode
> doesn't use the fast check/slowdown because it always runs
> at HZ frequency. That only happens in LAPIC mode.
>
> The standard fallback mode for unknown CPU is the non NMI timer
> fallback in oprofile_init, the IO APIC mode happens near never in practice.
Look at the fallback logic, the pure NMI profiler can fail for
a number of reasons, not just because the watchdog is in
I/O APIC mode.
No matter what the failure reason, nmi_int.c is used.
And in some of those cases, the nmi_hz has been decreased to '1'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists