[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090224062541.GO6298@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:25:41 +0100
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: hpet: stop HPET_COUNTER when programming
periodic mode
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:16:35AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>
> Impact: fix system hang on some systems operating with HZ_1000
>
> On a system that stalled with HZ_1000, the first value written to
> T0_CMP (when the main counter was not stopped) did not trigger an
> interrupt. Instead after the main counter wrapped around (after
> several minutes) an interrupt was triggered and afterwards the
> periodic interrupt took effect.
>
> This can be fixed by implementing HPET spec recommendation for
> programming the periodic mode (i.e. stopping the main counter).
Hi Ingo,
Please don't push this commit to Linus' tree.
Currently it's in tip:timers/hpet.
The patch didn't fix the problem that Mark Hounshell was reporting.
But first of all the patch might have side-effects as all hpet timers
that are affect when the main counter is stopped and reset. And
furthermore I have learned that there might have been hpet
implementations that require the second write (w/o HPET_TN_SETVAL bit)
to happen.
I am looking for a different solution.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists