[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1LbvDO-0001O1-Ov@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:12:42 +0100
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: Performance regression in write() syscall
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:03:04PM -0800, Salman Qazi wrote:
>> @@ -192,14 +192,20 @@ static inline int __copy_from_user_nocache(void *dst,
>> const void __user *src,
>> unsigned size)
>> {
>> might_sleep();
>> - return __copy_user_nocache(dst, src, size, 1);
>> + if (likely(size >= PAGE_SIZE))
>> + return __copy_user_nocache(dst, src, size, 1);
>> + else
>> + return __copy_from_user(dst, src, size);
>
> I think you disabled it completely, the kernel never really does
> any copies larger than page size because all its internal objects
> are page sized only.
>
> That check would need to be higher up the VFS stack (above filemap.c code)
> before the copies are split up.
It's bigger-or-equal, so this test is correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists