[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090224171718.GA3189@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:17:18 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tracing/ftrace: ftrace_bprintk
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:16:18AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These three patches are part of a patchset posted by Lai Jiangshan in december 2008.
> They introduce a binary version of ftrace_printk() called ftrace_bprintk()
>
> While having the same goal: print a generic message entry into the ring buffer,
> their approaches are very different.
>
> - ftrace_printk() does the formatting job on tracing time, insert the whole resulting string
> into the ring buffer, and then the string is printed on output time without a lot of modifications.
>
> - ftrace_bprintk() does no formatting on tracing time. Instead, it looks at the format string
> to find the types and the numbers of the arguments and directly stores them as-is into the
> ring-buffer. Then the format string is stored into the ring-buffer too, but only by its address,
> it is not copied. Then on output time only, the final string is formatted and sent to the user.
> This gives a result about as fast as a traditional tracer with fixed fields types, except that
> we can print random types and numbers of fields here.
>
>
> The first patch adds the generic support for binary formatting.
> The second adds the support for binary print types on ftrace
> and the last introduces ftrace_bprintk() which supports safely the modules
> by listening on the module loading/unloading notifier to keep track of
> unwanted freed format strings.
>
> Lai Jiangshan (3):
> add binary printf
> ftrace: infrastructure for supporting binary record
> ftrace: add ftrace_bprintk()
>
hi,
this seems like a really valuable feature....I'm just wondering about a
couple of things....
If the 'brpintk tracer' in trace/trace_bprintk.c is just being used to
set an enabled flag for printing out these binary records, then are we
better off with just an option flag in the 'trace_options' file?
Second, can we somehow combine ftrace_printk() and ftrace_bprintk(), so
that a developer can just use one interface? Perhaps, ftrace_printk
calls ftrace_bprintk if binary option flag is set, otherwise, it just
outputs things normally.
thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists