linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/20] Convert gfp_zone() to use a table of precalculated value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090224103226.e9e2766f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:32:26 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] Convert gfp_zone() to use a table of
 precalculated value

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:40:47 +0000
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:43:20AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > 
> > > > Are you sure that this is a benefit? Jumps are forward and pretty short
> > > > and the compiler is optimizing a branch away in the current code.
> > >
> > > Pretty easy to mispredict there, though, especially as you can tend
> > > to get allocations interleaved between kernel and movable (or simply
> > > if the branch predictor is cold there are a lot of branches on x86-64).
> > >
> > > I would be interested to know if there is a measured improvement.
> 
> Not in kernbench at least, but that is no surprise. It's a small
> percentage of the overall cost. It'll appear in the noise for anything
> other than micro-benchmarks.
> 
> > > It
> > > adds an extra dcache line to the footprint, but OTOH the instructions
> > > you quote is more than one icache line, and presumably Mel's code will
> > > be a lot shorter.
> > 
> 
> Yes, it's an index lookup of a shared read-only cache line versus a lot
> of code with branches to mispredict. I wasn't happy with the cache line
> consumption but it was the first obvious alternative.
> 
> > Maybe we can come up with a version of gfp_zone that has no branches and
> > no lookup?
> > 
> 
> Ideally, yes, but I didn't spot any obvious way of figuring it out at
> compile time then or now. Suggestions?
> 


Assume
  ZONE_DMA=0
  ZONE_DMA32=1
  ZONE_NORMAL=2
  ZONE_HIGHMEM=3
  ZONE_MOVABLE=4

#define __GFP_DMA       ((__force gfp_t)0x01u)
#define __GFP_DMA32     ((__force gfp_t)0x02u)
#define __GFP_HIGHMEM   ((__force gfp_t)0x04u)
#define __GFP_MOVABLE   ((__force gfp_t)0x08u)

#define GFP_MAGIC (0400030102) ) #depends on config.

gfp_zone(mask) = ((GFP_MAGIC >> ((mask & 0xf)*3) & 0x7)


Thx
-Kame




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/