[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090225070511.GG6690@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:05:11 -0500
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>,
mingo@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] headers_check cleanups break the whole world
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 07:56:32AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Note that if user-space is "playing utterly stupid games", it
> can cause trouble no matter what scheme we pick - so we have to
> filter out the reasonable problems that we should and can fix in
> the kernel.
>
Yeah, sorry, I should have been clearer, libcap does stupid
#define _LINUX_TYPES_H_
typedef unsigned int __u32;
#include <linux/header.h>
Which is just horribly broken when it's included early in a file and
then we try to #include <asm/sigcontext.h> (and doesn't get the rest
of those types since it now includes <linux/types.h> instead of
<asm/types.h>) (coreutils was doing this.)
The real case is something like using the dvb headers, which legitimately
is trying to include both <sys/*.h> and then <linux/dvb/*.h> and expecting
it to work.
The footnote in the prior mail was really just an example of why not
having just the plain __u32 et al types in their own header.
regards, Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists