[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090225120839.GC14279@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:08:39 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] gpu/drm, x86, PAT: Add PAT support for
io_mapping_* interface
* Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:
> io_mapping_create_wc(), io_mapping_free() and associated map/unmap routines
> are relatively new set of APIs for drivers, that change memory type.
>
> Currently, these interfaces hardcode WC type on x86 and does not go through
> "PAT enforcement". This patchset adds PAT support for this interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
hm, the patches look sane and clean and mostly factor out
existing code and checks and apply them to the io_mapping_*()
interfaces - so it's something worth having for .29.
But it's all rather awfully late in the cycle and ioremap type
of bugs typically have 1-2 rc's of latency to be fully
discovered.
They will probably fix a few regressions and are easy to revert,
plus they affect the one driver whose authors wrote these
facilities:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
so maybe we should try it as it's all a clear step forward. I'll
give them a spin in tip:x86/urgent. Dunno.
Linus, do you have any preference?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists