[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902250818200.3111@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:19:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH 2/2] PM: Rework handling of interrupts
during suspend-resume
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > I think the most important source of level triggered interrupts are PCI
> > devices, so perhaps we can make the PCI PM core use bit 10 of the PCI Device
> > Control register to prevent devices from generating INTx after the drivers'
> > suspend routines have been executed?
>
> I wish that were true. As I recall, the original PCI specification did
> not define this bit, and older PCI devices don't support it. So you
> can't count on being able to supress interrupt generation this way.
It's definitely a new feature. In fact, I think even the current one makes
it optional, so even for "new" devices it's very unclear how many of them
actually support that bit.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists