| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0902251250110.12697@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:05:35 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new irq tracer
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Jason Baron (jbaron@...hat.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:48:28AM -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > >> /**
> > > >> * handle_IRQ_event - irq action chain handler
> > > >> * @irq: the interrupt number
> > > >> @@ -354,7 +358,9 @@ irqreturn_t handle_IRQ_event(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action)
> > > >> local_irq_enable_in_hardirq();
> > > >>
> > > >> do {
> > > >> + trace_irq_entry(irq);
> > > >> ret = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
> > > >> + trace_irq_exit(irq, ret);
> > > >> if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
> > > >> status |= action->flags;
> > > >> retval |= ret;
> > > >
> > > > Nobdy want unnecessary redundant tracepoint.
> > > > Please discuss with mathieu, and merge his tracepoint.
> > >
> > > Hmm, from the viewpoint of trouble shooting, the place of LTTng's tracepoint
> > > is enough. However, from the same viewpoint, it should pass irq-number
> > > to irq-exit event too, because we may lost some previous events by buffer-overflow
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > trace_irq_entry(irq, NULL);
> > > ret = _handle_IRQ_event(irq, action);
> > > trace_irq_exit(irq, ret);
> > > ^^^^
> > >
> >
> > the lttng tracepoints wrap the calls to _handle_IRQ_event in 3
> > different places. So the above suggested irq tracepoint provides the
> > same information with 4 less tracepoints in the code. So I believe its
> > simpler - plus we can understand which action handlers are handling the
> > interrupt.
> >
>
> The main thing I dislike about only tracing action->handler() calls is
> that you are not tracing an IRQ per se, but rather the invocation of a
> given handler within the interrupt. For instance, it would be difficult
> to calculate the maximum interrupt latency for a given interrupt line,
> because you don't have the "real" irq entry/exit events, just the
> individual handler() calls.
Then use the function_graph tracer.
# echo smp_apic_timer_interrupt > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
# echo __irqentry_text_start >> /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
# echo function_graph > /debug/tracing/current_tracer
# cat /debug/tracing/trace
# tracer: function_graph
#
# CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
# | | | | | | |
------------------------------------------
1) kblockd-4012 => <idle>-0
------------------------------------------
1) ==========> |
1) + 35.783 us | smp_apic_timer_interrupt();
------------------------------------------
2) kstop/2-4013 => <idle>-0
------------------------------------------
2) ==========> |
2) + 13.819 us | smp_apic_timer_interrupt();
------------------------------------------
3) kstop/3-4014 => <idle>-0
------------------------------------------
3) ==========> |
3) + 24.919 us | __irqentry_text_start();
------------------------------------------
0) kstop/0-4011 => <idle>-0
------------------------------------------
0) ==========> |
0) + 24.444 us | smp_apic_timer_interrupt();
------------------------------------------
1) <idle>-0 => bash-3899
------------------------------------------
1) ==========> |
1) + 13.642 us | smp_apic_timer_interrupt();
2) ==========> |
2) + 15.014 us | smp_apic_timer_interrupt();
3) ==========> |
3) + 31.004 us | smp_apic_timer_interrupt();
------------------------------------------
0) <idle>-0 => sshd-3892
------------------------------------------
0) ==========> |
0) + 15.655 us | __irqentry_text_start();
0) ==========> |
0) + 37.722 us | __irqentry_text_start();
------------------------------------------
0) sshd-3892 => <idle>-0
------------------------------------------
0) ==========> |
0) + 26.139 us | __irqentry_text_start();
3) ==========> |
3) + 27.240 us | __irqentry_text_start();
3) ==========> |
3) + 21.987 us | __irqentry_text_start();
And there you have your latencies ;-)
With Jasons added trace points, we could add the to the event tracer
and those would show up as comments here.
-- Steve
>
> But I agree that knowing which handler is called is important.
>
> How about this compromise :
>
> trace_irq_entry(irq, action)
> _handle_IRQ_event()
> for each action {
> trace_irq_handler(action, ret);
> ret = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
> ...
> }
> trace_irq_exit(action_ret);
>
> Would that give you the information you need ?
>
> Here trace_irq_handler would be passed the _current_ action invoked and
> the _previous_ action return value. Note that we should initialize
> irqreturn_t ret to some initial value if we do this. That should keep
> the tracing overhead minimal.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists