[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090225222604.GA26938@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:26:04 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make CALLER_ADDRx overwriteable
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 05:20:13PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 17:16, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > The current definition of CALLER_ADDRx isn't suitable for all platforms.
> > E.g. for ARM __builtin_return_address(N) doesn't work for N > 0
>
> afaik, the same applies to the Blackfin port. we looked at
> implementing __builtin_return_address(N) and decided it wasnt worth
> the hassle.
I think the same applies for ARM:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/103804
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Strasse 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists