linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #12680] Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:06:39 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
	v.quequet-techniques@...nge.fr
Subject: Re: [Bug #12680] Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt.

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
> > Subject         : Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt.
> 
> Please change the subject.

Well, it would be helpful if you told me to what exactly.

> It has nothing to do with the VIA PadLock.

I changed it to something I thought was better. ;-)

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/