[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa79d98a0902252251p4476fa83ndc2d3286e7b27094@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:51:36 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] introduce pr_cont macro
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:28 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> Btw., why do those macros use ##__VA_ARGS__ ? Why not a straightforward:
>>
>> #define __pr_cont(args...) \
>> printk(KERN_CONT args)
>>
>
> Don't know if anyone cares, but __VA_ARGS__ is C99 whereas args... is a gcc
> extension, AFAIK.
>
> -hpa
>
I think in a sake of consistency better would be using __VA_ARGS__ here
too (since all prevous pr_...'s use it).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists