[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020902260126g589be187j5c5f52e1d8e13abf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:26:29 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Cleanup and optimise the page allocator V2
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:
> We tested this v2 patch series with 2.6.29-rc6 on different machines.
What .config is this? Specifically, is SLUB or SLAB used here?
>
> 4P qual-core 2P qual-core 2P qual-core HT
> tigerton stockley Nehalem
> ------------------------------------------------
> tbench +3% +2% 0%
> oltp -2% 0% 0%
> aim7 0% 0% 0%
> specjbb2005 +3% 0% 0%
> hackbench 0% 0% 0%
>
> netperf:
> TCP-S-112k 0% -1% 0%
> TCP-S-64k 0% -1% +1%
> TCP-RR-1 0% 0% +1%
> UDP-U-4k -2% 0% -2%
> UDP-U-1k +3% 0% 0%
> UDP-RR-1 0% 0% 0%
> UDP-RR-512 -1% 0% +1%
Powered by blists - more mailing lists