[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <344eb09a0902260210y44c0684by9b22f041116d3f7c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:40:23 +0530
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:35:33 +0800
> Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> ca is not checked before hierarchy support, and it's a side-effect.
>>
>> Before cpuacct is initialized, css == task->cgroups->subsys[cpuacct_subsys] == NULL,
>> but ca = task_ca(tsk) is not necessarily NULL, unless struct cgroup_subsys_state is the
>> first member of struct cpuacct.
>>
>> And the above code actually should be:
>>
>> do {
>> ...
>> } while (ca->parent);
>>
> I'll send no more objections to this patch itself.
>
> But IMHO, this loop is tooo bad, I think. The hierarchy information should be gathered by
> read-side and the total code should be
How do you take care of accounting when a group gets deleted ?.
Wouldn't you loose some information due to deleted groups if you want
to accumulate hierarchical stats only during read ?
Regards,
Bharata.
--
http://bharata.sulekha.com/blog/posts.htm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists