linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1235645019.4645.4780.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:43:39 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction

On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:10 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:

> My point is the likely/unlikely in this case depends on turning on/off
> CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT? Am I missing something?

Yeah, that whole function is a stub for !CPUACCT

#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT
static void cpuacct_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime);
#else
static inline void cpuacct_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime) {}
#endif


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/