linux-kernel - Re: Unused modules in 2.6.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090226103032.185a8bbd@lithium.local.net>
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:30:32 +0000
From:	Alex Buell <alex.buell@...ted.org.uk>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unused modules in 2.6.x

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0800, I waved a wand and this message
magically appears in front of Greg KH:

> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 05:52:49PM +0000, Alex Buell wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Perhaps I missed something when the 2.6.x kernels got started a few
> > years back, but why is it not possible for unused modules to be
> > automatically unloaded anymore i.e with rmmod -a? I remember being
> > able to do that with the 2.2.x and 2.4.x series a long time ago.
> 
> Because if you do that, lots of modules that were being "used" by the
> system would get unloaded (usb host controllers, network drivers,
> etc.)
> 
> So it makes sense not to do that anymore.  See the linux-kernel
> archives about 6 years ago for details if you are curious about this
> historical issue (hint, it could burn you very badly even in 2.2 and
> 2.4...)

I see, thanks. 
-- 
http://www.munted.org.uk

Fearsome grindings.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/