[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090226114457.GB6651@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:44:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
shai@...lex86.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: don't compile vsmp_64 for 32bit
* Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:20:50PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> >Impact: cleanup
> >
> >that is only needed when CONFIG_X86_VSMP is defined with 64bit
> >also remove dead code about PCI, because CONFIG_X86_VSMP depends on PCI
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> >
>
> NAK!
> vsmp64.c is compiled unconditionally for a reason. There are ifdefs in the
> file to avoid code compilation based on config options. is_vsmp_box() is
> needed even when CONFIG_X86_VSMP is not enabled, since distro kernels don't ship
> with CONFIG_X86_VSMP, and since is_vsmp_box() is used to determine whether
> tsc's can be considered synced or not, this is needed.
is_vsmp_box() is always available:
> >+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_VSMP
> > extern int is_vsmp_box(void);
> >+#else
> >+static inline int is_vsmp_box(void)
> >+{
> >+ return 0;
> >+}
> >+#endif
What this patch does is it reduces the kernel's size when
CONFIG_X86_VSMP is turned off and also makes the code arguably
cleaner.
> In the future, I would appreciate if you copy me on
> cleanups/changes involving vsmp64.c
That is what i did when i queued up the change. That is how you
became aware of this commit.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists