linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1235650806.4948.71.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:20:06 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction

On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:06 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Hmm.. some routine like
> atomic64_read() can help this ? (But I don't want to use atomic_t here..)

Yeah, atomic64_t has been proposed numerous times, and x86 could
actually implement that using cmpxchg8b, just not sure about all the
other 32bit archs, and if we start using it in the scheduler, they'd
better have it implemented.

Furthermore, it would require all the ops to be atomic, which would
require them all to use cmpxchg8b and its a horridly expensive op to
use :-(

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/