[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200902261340.57353.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:40:56 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Yeah, atomic64_t has been proposed numerous times, and x86
> > could actually implement that using cmpxchg8b, just not sure
> > about all the other 32bit archs, and if we start using it in
> > the scheduler, they'd better have it implemented.
>
> I have written a working atomic64_t implementation for
> tip:perfcounters/core, for 32-bit x86.
It should also be possible to write an asm-generic atomic64_t
implementation based on the parisc atomic_t hashlock code.
For non-SMP configurations, it falls back on local_irq_save(),
which is already the method used for atomic_t on half the
embedded architectures.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists