lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:05:12 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] add binary printf

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:56:35PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Instead of calling the in/out helper from the decoder, why not 
> > calling the decoder from these three functions and let them 
> > take the appropriate actions for each decoded format token?
> > 
> > Naive example:
> > 
> > bstr_printf() {
> > 	while (decode_format(...))
> > 		if (type == number)
> > 			read_number_from_buf()
> > 			str = number(....)
> > 		....
> > }
> > 
> > vsnprintf {
> > 	while (decode_format(...))
> > 		if (type == number)
> > 			var_arg(...)
> > 			str = number(....)
> > 		....
> > }
> > 
> > vbin_printf {
> > 	while (decode_format(...))
> > 		if (type == number)
> > 			var_arg(...)
> > 			write_number_to_buffer()
> > 		...
> > }
> > 
> > And the standard in/out pieces can be invoked through helpers.
> 
> ok, that looks rather clean too. And maybe vsnprintf() and 
> bstr_printf() could be further unified?


Yes, read process can be unified between vbin_printf and vsnprintf
and write process can be unified between bstr_printf and vsnprintf,
both further than the above example.


> I guess it depends on how it all looks like in the end. Only one 
> way to find out ...


Let's try, the practice will tell us more, I'm on it.

Thanks.

> 	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ