[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49A5EA1E.5@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:02:22 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
CC: arnd@...db.de, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>,
mingo@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] make netfilter use strict integer types
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Thursday 2009-02-26 01:14, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> IMHO, __uXX should be replaced by uintX_t, but a move this great I
>>> will leave to future generations because there is just too much
>>> persisting opinions wrt. such proposal. As such I'd like to join
>>> and persist on my position and that uintX that we have should be kept.
>> We *CAN'T* replace __uXX with uintX_t. Period, full stop, end of story.
>
> Would the mindful master please elaborate why this is so, if it is
> indeed not a personal decision.
POSIX has strict rules as to what symbols you are allowed to present
into the user-visible namespace. This means you can't use these types
for any header that may be indirectly included.
Since we can't use them in general, it's silly to use them for a
minority of headers, which would then have different exposure rules than
people otherwise can expect.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists