lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49A5EA1E.5@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:02:22 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
CC:	arnd@...db.de, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>,
	mingo@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] make netfilter use strict integer types

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Thursday 2009-02-26 01:14, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> IMHO, __uXX should be replaced by uintX_t, but a move this great I
>>> will leave to future generations because there is just too much
>>> persisting opinions wrt. such proposal. As such I'd like to join
>>> and persist on my position and that uintX that we have should be kept.
>> We *CAN'T* replace __uXX with uintX_t.  Period, full stop, end of story.
> 
> Would the mindful master please elaborate why this is so, if it is
> indeed not a personal decision.

POSIX has strict rules as to what symbols you are allowed to present 
into the user-visible namespace.  This means you can't use these types 
for any header that may be indirectly included.

Since we can't use them in general, it's silly to use them for a 
minority of headers, which would then have different exposure rules than 
people otherwise can expect.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ