| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090226220136.GA24667@dario.dodds.net> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:01:36 -0800 From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@...ian.org> To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, libpam-modules@...kages.debian.org, debian-admin@...ts.debian.org Subject: Re: 2.6.28, rlimits, performance and debian etch On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:48:25PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > It has already been mentioned that this does not apply to the upcoming > > Debian 5.0 release (lenny); this patch is only present in the 4.0 > > release (etch), it was actually fixed in the development series to not > > use RLIM_INFINITY *because* previous kernels didn't support this and > > would cause pam_limits to throw log warnings. > I've just migrated my home servers from Debian etch to lenny and bind9 now > gives me this: > named[17207]: max open files (1024) is smaller than max sockets (4096) That's a separate issue; Debian bug #515673. I intend to solve this for Debian 5.0.1. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@...ntu.com vorlon@...ian.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists