| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902262255190.9135@localhost.localdomain> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:06:17 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> cc: Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc6 On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, john stultz wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 22:35 +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote: > > > Also mind sending the full dmesg for both kernels? > > > > http://krogh.cc/~jesper/dmesg-2.6.29-rc6.txt > > http://krogh.cc/~jesper/dmesg-2.6.26.8.txt > > So one interesting difference: > 2.6.26.8: TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER > 2.6.29-rc6: Fast TSC calibration using PIT > > Thomas, any thoughts as to why we might be calibrating off the PIT > instead of the PM_TIMER w/ 2.6.29? Yup, because we introduced the Fast PIT calibration in 2.6.28. Is the delta anything NTP might get upset about: 2.6.26: time.c: Detected 2311.847 MHz processor. 2.6.29: Detected 2310.029 MHz processor. If yes, then we need to fix NTP not the calibration code :) > Maybe does this line provide a hint? > FADT: X_PM1a_EVT_BLK.bit_width (16) does not match PM1_EVT_LEN (4) Red herring. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists