linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ath5k: fix hw rate index condition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49A7236E.2020807@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:19:10 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>
CC:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@...il.com>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ath5k: fix hw rate index condition

On 27.2.2009 00:15, Bob Copeland wrote:
> Speaking of, I think there's another potential oob array access at:
>
> if (rxs.rate_idx>= 0&&  rs.rs_rate ==
>      sc->curband->bitrates[rxs.rate_idx].hw_value_short)
>          rxs.flag |= RX_FLAG_SHORTPRE;
>
> because sc->rate_idx is u8 instead of s8.

strcmp("sc->rate_idx", "rxs.rate_idx") != 0 :)

Or did I miss something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/