[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902251956450.3111@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:57:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during
suspend-resume
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>
> I don't think this is a oddball case. It is very common to connect
> keys or keypads to gpios. If these keys are wakeup keys, it is not OK
> to loose interrupts during the suspend phase.
.. and how many drivers is that? Is it one or two "gpio input drivers" or
is it a hundred?
The "common" is not so much about "how many machines", but "in how many
drivers would you actually do this".
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists