lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902270049440.7158@asgard.lang.hm>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:10:24 -0800 (PST)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ip_nonlocal_bind and sendto

I've got a need to forge the source IP of UDP packets (a stupid syslog 
receiver app that I need to deal with)

I know that this can be done with raw sockets, but with the 
IP_nonlocal_bind option I thought that it may be possible to do this 
without dealing with raw sockets

so I have an app that does the socket call, followed by the bind call 
without any errors, but when I issue the sendto call it generates error 22 
(invalid parameter) if the source IP doesn't exist on the local box 
somewhere.

is this the kernel that is doing whatever check is failing? or is glibc 
wrapping the kernel syscall and doing some additional checking?

if it is the kernel that's throwing the error, is there some way of 
disabling this check? or do I have to go to raw sockets?

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ