[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090227113813.GB21296@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:38:13 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, riel@...hat.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] Get rid of the concept of hot/cold page freeing
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:15:49PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:00:22PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > I tried the general use of a pool of zeroed pages back in 2005. Zeroing
> > made sense only if the code allocating the page did not immediately touch
> > the cachelines of the page.
>
> Any feeling as to how often this was the case?
IMO background zeroing or anything like that is only going to
become less attractive. Heat and energy considerations are
relatively increasing, so doing speculative work in the kernel
is going to become relatively more costly. Especially in this
case where you use nontemporal stores or otherwise reduce the
efficiency of the CPU caches (and increase activity on bus and
memory).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists