[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090227005033.GA20046@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:50:33 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: karl@...amoto.org, chohnstaedt@...ominate.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixp4xx_crypto panic with fragmented packets in
scatterlist
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> I don't think you can use chained scatterlists unless the architecture
> supports it. It's not a case that you have to flatten the chaining
> before passing it over to the arch - it seems you're not allowed to
> create a chained scatterlist in the first place:
>
> static inline void sg_chain(struct scatterlist *prv, unsigned int prv_nents,
> struct scatterlist *sgl)
> {
> #ifndef ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
> BUG();
> #endif
The crypto layer does its own chaining. However, this chaining
is not meant to be exposed to any external entities until generic
chaining has been ported everywhere.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists