[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49A7DE0D.5090205@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:35:25 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....EDU>
CC: Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....EDU>, Waseem Daher <wdaher@....EDU>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modpost: Check the section flags, not name, to catch
missing "ax"/"aw"
Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> This is a pretty critical set of warnings, that often represent real
>> bugs. I don't think it's acceptable to lose them. However, you already
>> have (prior in the sequence) changed those section names to not conflict
>> with the automatically generated ones, so it seems to me that this
>> should be fixable without too much pain.
>
> Actually, the problem arises from a conflict between two classes of
> automatically generated section names, one from ld, and one from gcc.
> Instead of basing the warning on section names (the existing heuristic
> also fails to warn on some cases where it should, as it turns out), what
> do you think about this patch? I've tested that it still triggers the
> warning when an "ax" or "aw" is incorrectly removed, and it should handle
> even more cases than before.
>
Seems reasonable to me.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists