[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090227070633.2c3fc04e@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:06:33 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org,
jonathan@...masters.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] genirq: add support for threaded interrupt handlers
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:05:10 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Right, Thomas did the EHCI usb driver, the network driver you propose
> is a tad hard since it relies on the whole network stack softirq
> stuff. Re-working the whole net-stack to make use of threaded
> handlers is a massive undertaking -- although I seem to remember
> someone doing it a few years back and seeing a general performance
> improvement, Thomas still got a link to that work?
we shouldn't have to; just running the softirq handler from the irq
thread should work, and not lose real performance.
Sure you're not going to get a performance gain that you could get
but it still works.
or am I missing something?
(and esp for things like wireless drivers, that should be just fine; I
can understand hesitation to do 10g ethernet drivers right away ;-)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists