[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49A81E59.6010105@nortel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:09:45 -0600
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2009-02-23 15:04:22, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> We can just as well have a class of tasks less important than power
>> saving. They'd just run when power saving is not active for some other
>> reason. Just like other such schemes we end up with the problem
>> of priority inversion with locking.
>
> Ok, I guess this could be interesting in some cases... maybe. What are
> real examples of such tasks?
Some people might put casual system monitoring tools into this
category--top, xload, gkrellm, xclock, etc.
It'd be nice if the animated banner ad in my web browser could be
treated this way. :)
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists