[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49A83E7D.1080508@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:26:53 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: add brk allocation for very, very early allocations
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> unsigned int boot_cpu_id __read_mostly;
>> +__initdata unsigned long _brk_start, _brk_end;
>>
>>
>
> Better yet, initialize _brk_start and _brk_end statically:
>
> extern const char _end[];
> __initdata unsigned long _brk_start = (unsigned long)&_end;
> __initdata unsigned long _brk_end = (unsigned long)&_end;
>
> That way it's available from the first instruction, and we can fully
> remove the x86-32 init_pg_tables_end and replace it with _brk_end (thus
> putting the initial page tables in the brk.)
Yes. It doesn't work for Xen (the domain builder puts the initrd and
Xen-built pagetable immediately after the kernel's bss), but its no
problem to move the brk in that case.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists