[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b040c32a0902271600h31785bb8q93acde59f5d15e3d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:00:06 -0800
From: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
"lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@...e.hu,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change cpuacct usage percpu format v2
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:34 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> "a lot of" ? I talking about cpu hotplug and reading another file as
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/present every time before reading this file
> gives much much much more overhead ;)
yes, really a lot. CPU hotplug is an uncommon event. It happens
perhaps once a day? maybe once an hour?
User monitoring process usually reads usage_percpu at fairly high
rate, say once a sec. At each pass it will need to parse N number of
CPU index. The overhead is N_CPU * T, where T is time in second
between cpu hotplug event. Assume T = one day, on a moderate sized
64-CPU size machine, the overhead is:
64 * 86400 : 1, that's like 5.5 million to 1 ratio. To me that is
*high* overhead.
- Ken
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists