[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49A8F04D.4090409@goop.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:05:33 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Hm, how can the same code that you call "massive out-of-tree
> patches which doesn't make anyone happy" in an out of tree
> context suddenly become non-intrusive "minor amount of extra
> stuff" in an upstream context?
>
> I wish the upstream kernel was able to do such magic, but i'm
> afraid it is not.
No, but I am ;) The current out of tree Xen patches are very intrusive
because there hasn't been much incentive to reduce their impact. I've
going through it all and very carefully rewriting it 1) be cleaner, 2)
enable/disable itself at runtime, 3) have clean interfaces and
interactions with the rest of the kernel, and 4) address any concerns
that others have. In other words, make Xen a first-class kernel citizen.
Most of the intrusive stuff has already been merged (and merged for some
time now), but without dom0 support its only half done; as it stands
people are using mainline Linux for their domUs, but are still limited
to patched up (old) kernels for dom0. This is a real problem because
all the drivers for interesting new devices are in the new kernels, so
there's an additional burden of backporting device support into old kernels.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists