[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ab8632od.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:13:22 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org,
jonathan@...masters.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] genirq: add support for threaded interrupt handlers
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> Given that this threaded-irq code appears to be new and not very tested
> in -rt, I think it would be a good idea to convert some popular drivers
> (e1000/e1000e) so that the core code gets a good thrashing before we
> merge it.
It's questionable it's a good idea for these kind of network drivers,
because the majority of work should be done in NAPI context anyways.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists