linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC] vsprintf: unify the format decoding layer for its 3 users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090228171838.GA5821@nowhere>
Date:	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:18:39 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] vsprintf: unify the format decoding layer for its
	3 users

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 08:54:15AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > 
> > You're right, that's much proper.
> > See the V2 below:
> 
> Good. This looks better.
> 
> One final (?) nit:
> 
> > +		default: {
> > +			enum format_type type = spec.type;
> > +
> > +			if (type == FORMAT_TYPE_LONG_LONG)
> > +				num = va_arg(args, long long);
> > +			else if (type == FORMAT_TYPE_ULONG)
> > +				num = va_arg(args, unsigned long);
> > +			else if (type == FORMAT_TYPE_LONG)
> > +				num = va_arg(args, unsigned long);
> > +			else if (type == FORMAT_TYPE_SIZE_T)
> > +				num = va_arg(args, size_t);
> > +			else if (type == FORMAT_TYPE_PTRDIFF)
> > +				num = va_arg(args, ptrdiff_t);
> > +			else if (type == FORMAT_TYPE_USHORT)
> > +				num = (unsigned short) va_arg(args, int);
> > +			else if (type == FORMAT_TYPE_SHORT)
> > +				num = (short) va_arg(args, int);
> > +			else if (type == FORMAT_TYPE_UINT)
> > +				num = va_arg(args, unsigned int);
> > +			else
> > +				num = va_arg(args, unsigned int);
> > +
> > +			str = number(str, end, num, spec.base,
> > +				spec.field_width, spec.precision, spec.flags);
> 
> You've got three copes of these (in the three different users), and that 
> just looks horrid. I see why you did it, but even something like
> 
> 		case FORMAT_TYPE_LONG_LONG:
> 			num = va_arg(args, long long);
> 			goto handle_number;
> 		case FORMAT_TYPE_ULONG:
> 		...
> 		case FORMAT_TYPE_INT:
> 			num = va_arg(args, int);
> 	handle_number:
> 		str = number(str, end, num, &spec);
> 		break;
> 
> would be better.
> 
> And yes, please do pass in "spec" to the "number()/pointer()/string()" 
> routines instead of exploding it into the individual numbers. When 
> cleaning up, let's just do it properly..
> 
> 		Linus


Ok, I'm addressing your comments and those from Ingo, then I will rebase
the whole patchset (with the ftrace_bprintk related things) against latest
-tip and resend it.

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/