| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090228095433.6af07a89@infradead.org> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:54:33 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, stable@...nel.org Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > But here is the patch you asked for. > > > > Yes, this looks much more straightforward. > > > > And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially > > a 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ > > seccomp. It does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but > > it might not be used anywhere. > > It's enabled in SuSE kernels. > but are there users of it? I thought Andrea stopped the cpushare thing that was the only user of this.... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists